Biological agents have long been feared in warfare for the potential to cause mass casualties and fatalities when weaponized. The anthrax attacks following

Biological agents have long been feared in warfare for the potential to cause mass casualties and fatalities when weaponized. The anthrax attacks following the devasting events of September 11, 2001, showed the effectiveness of bioterror (BT) agents even when they do not result in mass casualties and fatalities. The fear of an attack using BT agents is often enough to cause panic, making them an ideal asset for terrorists. Using the unit readings and your own research, choose one (1) of the following BT agents: 

  • Clostridium botulinum
  • Yersenia pestis
  • Varielo virus
  • Ebola virus
  • Zika virus

The History of Plague – Part 1. The Three Great Pandemics

The History of Plague Pt 2. The discoveries of the plague Bacillus and its Vector

What makes this an effective agent in terms of mass casualty and fatality? What are the strengths and limitations of this agent as a weapon? Using the public response to the Covid-19 infection ( i.e., decisions whether or not to wear masks, social distance, voluntary and involuntary travel ban adherence, isolation and quarantine, etc.), discuss the roles these behaviors play in affecting the number of casualties and fatalities.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

CRJ317 Week 8 Activity Template Student Name: [Enter text here]

CRJ317 Week 8 Activity Template Student Name: [Enter text here] Date: [Enter text here] Course: [Enter text here] Instructor: [Enter text here] Week 8 Activity Template: The Ethics of Electronic Monitoring Tech and Its Ethical Issue Response © 2024 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and

Chapter notes/

Chapter notes/ PowerPoints Data/image4-14.png Data/PlaceholderImage-12.png Data/image6-18.jpeg Data/image5-16.jpeg Data/image4-small-15.png Data/PresetImageFill3-4.jpg Data/PresetImageFill1-2.jpg Data/PresetImageFill2-3.jpg Data/PresetImageFill4-5.jpg Data/image7-20.jpeg Data/image2-10.png Data/image1-8.png Data/PresetImageFill5-6.jpg Data/PlaceholderImage-small-13.png Data/PresetImageFill0-1.jpg Data/image6-small-19.jpeg Data/mt-251A2753-4B5A-4F62-899A-0D24CA33FE25-22.jpg Data/image5-small-17.jpeg Data/bullet_gbutton_gray-7.png Data/mt-3C5A7B2E-490D-4806-81DC-4895C2552D9E-23.jpg Data/mt-925FA7CC-EF41-4B28-8CA0-1767079E592E-25.jpg Data/mt-6E52489D-BFAF-4D9C-B3DA-B07DBD89F508-26.jpg Data/mt-38A09323-B11F-42C5-9314-37444D39B545-27.jpg Data/mt-1492C9C6-FB15-434F-AA58-04AE30FB05CE-24.jpg Data/mt-C624A6CA-88B2-45EC-BE13-EA373EC08875-28.jpg Data/image7-small-21.jpeg Data/image1-small-9.png Data/image2-small-11.png preview.jpg

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of