Description
Instructions for Submission
Your submission should be a detailed and well-structured report that addresses all the sections outlined above. You are encouraged to use real-world examples, ensure your analysis is backed by research, and include appropriate citations.
Submission Requirements
(10 Marks Total)
Criteria
Introduction
Historical
Background
Weight
Excellent
(90-100%)
1 mark
Clear, thorough
definition of MIS and
its significance.
1 mark
Technological
Advancements
1 mark
The Internet
Era
1.5
marks
Modern
Trends
Future
Outlook
1.5
marks
1 mark
Comprehensive
coverage of early MIS
development with
key systems wellresearched.
Insightful analysis of
1980s-1990s
advancements,
including databases
and interfaces.
Excellent analysis of
the internet’s impact
on MIS, with wellresearched
examples.
Thorough
exploration of cloud,
mobile tech, and
other trends with
strong examples.
Well-reasoned
speculation on future
MIS technologies and
their impact.
Good
(80-89%)
Satisfactory
(70-79%)
Needs
Improvement
(50-69%)
Unsatisfactory
(Below 50%)
Adequate
definition and
explanation of
MIS.
Basic
understanding of
MIS with minimal
explanation of its
significance.
Lacks clear
definition or
significance of
MIS.
Missing or unclear
introduction.
Adequate
coverage of early
MIS systems and
development.
Basic coverage
with some missing
details or key
systems.
Lacks depth and
research on early
MIS development.
Incomplete or
poorly researched
historical section.
Good analysis
with relevant
examples of
technological
impacts on MIS.
Good analysis
with appropriate
examples of the
internet’s
influence.
Basic explanation
of technological
advancements
with limited
examples.
Minimal analysis,
missing key
advancements or
lacking depth.
Insufficient detail or
analysis of
advancements.
Basic analysis with
limited or unclear
examples of the
internet’s role.
Minimal
exploration of
internet influence
on MIS.
Incomplete or
unclear analysis of
the internet era’s
effect on MIS.
Good discussion
of modern trends
and relevant
examples.
Basic coverage of
trends with
limited examples
or depth.
Minimal
exploration or
missing key
trends and
examples.
Insufficient
discussion of
modern trends.
Good speculation
with some
connection to
current trends.
Basic outlook
lacking depth or
clear reasoning.
Limited
speculation with
insufficient
Vague or incomplete
future outlook.
connection to
current trends.
Research &
Use of
Examples
1 mark
Clarity and
Structure
1 mark
Presentation
0.5
marks
Referencing
0.5
marks
Excellent use of
relevant real-world
examples, wellresearched and cited.
Well-structured,
clear, and logical
with professional
tone throughout.
Excellent formatting
and presentation
with no errors.
All sources correctly
cited in APA style
with no errors.
Good use of
examples with
appropriate
research.
Generally clear
with minor
structural issues.
Good formatting,
few minor errors.
Minor errors in
APA citations.
Satisfactory
examples, but
lacking depth or
relevance.
Basic structure but
some issues with
clarity or
organization.
Acceptable
formatting with
some errors.
Noticeable errors
in citations or
reference list.
Limited examples
or insufficient
research.
Poor or no realworld examples
provided.
Disorganized or
difficult to follow.
Poorly organized or
unclear structure.
Poor formatting
or multiple errors
present.
Major issues with
citation style or
missing sources.
Inadequate
formatting or
significant errors.
No citations or
failure to follow
APA style.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
