nursingstudyhelp.com logo

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Discussion Board Rubric Criteria Unsatisfactory Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total Ideas, Arguments, & Analysis 0-15 points 16-19 points

Discussion Board Rubric

Criteria Unsatisfactory Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total
Ideas, Arguments,
& Analysis

0-15 points 16-19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25

Ideas expressed lack an
understanding of the discussion
topic. Comments are irrelevant,
off-topic, and/or confusing to
follow

Ideas expressed in discussion posts
show a minimal understanding of
the discussion topic. Comments are
general in nature and/or
occasionally may not be relevant.

Ideas expressed in discussion
posts are mostly substantive
and relevant to topic; some
original thought.

Ideas expressed in discussion
posts include original thought,
substantial depth, and are
relevant to topic.

Connection to
Course Materials

0-15 points 16-19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25

No connections are made to
readings or other course
materials (lectures, media,
resources, etc.)

Minimal direct connections are
made to readings and/or other
course materials (lectures, media,
resources, etc.)

Some direct connections are
made to readings and/or
other course materials
(lectures, media, resources,
etc.)

Strong, direct connections are
made to readings and/or other
course materials (lectures, media,
resources, etc.)

Writing Quality 0-4 points 5-6 points 7-8 points 9-10 points /10
Reviews show a below
average/poor writing style that
lacks standard English, and/or is
difficult for readers to follow.
Contains frequent errors in
grammar, punctuation, usage,
and spelling.

Review shows an average and/or
casual writing style using standard
English that is generally clear but
contains some errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and spelling.

Review shows above average
writing style that is clear
using standard English with
minor errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and/or
spelling.

Review shows above average
writing style that is clear using
standard English with minor
errors in grammar, punctuation,
usage, and/or spelling.

Required Peer
Response/
Timeliness

0-10 points 11-20 points 21-30 points 31-40 points /40

One peer review mission or both
responses are below 50 words.

Missing one peer review or both
responses are below 100 words.

Completed both peer
reviews, but responses did
not meet 150 words.

Both peer reviews consist of at
least 150 words and provide a
thoughtful response.

TOTAL POINTS (sum of Criteria) /100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

   Create an evaluation plan to assess the effectiveness of assessing the quality of healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental

   Create an evaluation plan to assess the effectiveness of assessing the quality of healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Define the problem, include specific indicators, and provide a plan for the implementation of both formative and summative evaluation strategies. Include specific research methodologies and related statistical and

respond to 2 of the attached group PowerPoint presentations addressing the following the instructions  Population health nursing week 7 assignment

respond to 2 of the attached group PowerPoint presentations addressing the following the instructions  Population health nursing week 7 assignment Each student will respond to 2 of the group PowerPoint presentations addressing the following components:  1. Key take aways (challenges, strengths, significant data that impacted you). 2. Consider the FEMA