Module 3 – Case PERFORMANCE/TALENT MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENT—CONSULTING—OD Assignment

Module 3 – Case

PERFORMANCE/TALENT MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENT—CONSULTING—OD

Assignment Overview

Signature Assignment: Body of Knowledge, Introduced Level

In this assignment your body of knowledge will be assessed at the “introduced” level. The first criterion, “Assignment Driven” in the rubric will be useful for this purpose. Then in HRM599 knowledge will be further assessed at the “emphasized” level.

Case Assignment

Address the following questions in an essay format which includes an introduction and conclusion (not a Q & A format):

· As an HR consultant, design a process for your employer to analyze what changes are needed in their HRD procedures, policies, and practices to improve the development of employees. Discuss the process you would follow and why you selected those process steps.

· Be sure to bring in what you have learned from your change management, internal consulting, and organizational development readings.

Provide private-sector employer examples of HRM programs, systems, processes, and/or procedures as you address the assignment requirements. Provide names of the employers in your examples. Use different employer examples in this course than what have been used previously in your other papers and courses.

Utilize information from 
at least 2 sources from the Trident Online Library to help strengthen and validate your discussion.  

Paper length: 
3–4 pages (not counting the cover and reference pages).

Assignment Expectations

Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the Case rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:

·
Assignment-Driven: Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment?   Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

·
Critical Thinking: Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

·
Business Writing: Is the essay logical, well organized and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

·
Effective Use of Information: Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood, and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

·
Citing Sources: Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing, by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the References page?

·
Timeliness: Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or before the module’s due date?

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Description 5.1 Learning Outcomes: Recognize the overall knowledge management processes, concepts, goals and strategies within the context of

Description 5.1 Learning Outcomes: Recognize the overall knowledge management processes, concepts, goals and strategies within the context of organization. Demonstrate effective knowledge management skills to utilise knowledge management tools for the benefits of the organization. 5.2 Action Required: Click on the following link to watch a short video. Listen to

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer- reviewed research you reviewed.

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer- reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. / 20 pts · Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes,

Description

Description Read the first task and complete the second task I do not want to repeat the solution with someone else – citing reliable sources ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi Electronic University College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment

Description

Description The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder. Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted. Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page. Students

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi Electronic University College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment 2 Quality Management (MGT 424) Due Date: 03/08/2024 @ 23:59 Course Name: Quality Management Student’s Name: Course Code: MGT 424 Student’s ID Number: Semester: