Instructions are attached
supporting doc attached
|
Presenter’s Name: |
Gregory Swim |
|
Person Providing Critique: |
Brianna Davis |
|
Component |
Comments |
|
Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. |
|
|
APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in an easy-to-understand manner. The presenter discussed relevant research included in the brief. It was clear how the APA was trying to contribute to the case. |
|
|
Opinion: I understood the outcome of the case and the presenter made clear how this did/did not coincide with the APA’s goals in their brief. |
|
|
Overall: This lecture was thorough, clear, interesting, and I learned something. The format was uncluttered and the length was appropriate. APA referencing was used properly and grammar/spelling was correct. |
Directions: View the assigned PowerPoint presentations and fill out the form – one per each student’s presentation you are critiquing. For each component, write your comments. Write as much or as little as you feel necessary; the comments table should expand as you write. Remember, your critique will be graded as well – 25 points per critique.
Due by Sunday at 11:59 P.M. ET.
